Can AI Really Replace Human Writers? We Tested It

In a world where artificial intelligence is writing everything from emails to screenplays, the big question for content creators is no longer “Can AI write?” but “Can it write well enough to replace us?”

To find out, we at UncommonPen decided to run a little experiment. We took a popular blog topic – “The Future of Remote Work” – and gave it to two writers: one human, and one machine (ChatGPT-4o). Same brief. Same word count. No outside help.

The results? Eye-opening.

—

The Setup: Human vs. Machine

We wanted a fair fight.

Topic: The Future of Remote Work

Length: 800–1,000 words

Tone: Informative, professional, and a bit conversational

Deadline: 60 minutes

We gave this brief to an experienced human writer and to ChatGPT. Neither saw the other’s draft.

—

The Comparison: Side-by-Side Highlights

Let’s break it down.

Originality

AI: The post was structured, clean, and keyword-rich but generic. Phrases like “a paradigm shift in workplace culture” felt like they’d been copy-pasted from a hundred other blogs.

Human: Included personal anecdotes and specific examples (e.g., “When Slack became my new hallway…”). More voice, less jargon.

1 Point: Human

Structure & Flow

AI: Well-organized, with clear subheadings and transitions. Flawlessly followed the prompt.

Human: Took a more exploratory route. Slightly looser structure, but more natural and narrative-driven.

1 Point: Tie (AI for structure, Human for storytelling)

Accuracy & Insight

AI: Included recent stats but hallucinated one source (which didn’t exist on fact-check).

Human: Cited real sources and added a nuanced take on hybrid work policy shifts in small vs. large companies.

1 Point: Human

Tone & Style

AI: Clean, professional, but a little bland. No real “voice.”

Human: Witty, warm, and reflective. Used metaphors. Took risks.

1 Point: Human

—

Reader Test: Could People Tell?

We posted both anonymously and asked 100 readers to vote on which was human-written.

76% correctly identified the human version.

24% said they preferred the AI version for clarity and brevity.

Turns out, AI can mimic style – but not quite soul.

—

So… Can AI Replace Human Writers?

The Pros of AI Writing

Fast and efficient (seconds, not hours)

Great for idea generation and outlines

Useful for SEO and formatting help

The Cons

Lacks emotional depth

Struggles with storytelling and nuance

May hallucinate facts or sources

—

When to Use AI (and When to Avoid It)

Use AI for…
Drafting outlines
SEO optimization
Rewriting basic content
Grammar checks

Avoid AI for…
Personal stories
Persuasive brand copy
Complex argumentation
Thought leadership pieces

—

Final Thoughts: The Human Advantage

AI is a powerful writing tool, no doubt. But it’s a tool – not a replacement.

What makes human writing work is what AI can’t fake: experience, empathy, context, and voice. The best content in 2025 isn’t written by AI or against it – it’s written with it.

Writers who know how to collaborate with AI, not compete with it, will lead the future of content.

—

What Do You Think?

Have you tried writing with AI? Could you tell the difference between human and machine in our test?
Drop a comment below or tag us @UncommonPen on Twitter/X.